Harmonizing Data: A Symphony of Segmenting, Concatenating, Pivoting, and Merging

In the world of data science, where raw information swirls in a cacophony of numbers and variables, lies the art of harmonizing data. Like a maestro conducting a symphony, the skilled data scientist orchestrates the disparate elements of datasets, weaving them together into a harmonious composition of insights.

Welcome to a journey where data transcends mere numbers and, instead, transforms into a vibrant melody of patterns and revelations. Let’s explore the intricacies of segmenting, concatenating, pivoting, and merging data using the powerful tools of Python and Pandas.

In the first movement of the symphony below, “Segmenting and Concatenating: Choreographing with Pandas,” you’ll delve into the graceful act of dividing datasets into meaningful segments and seamlessly stitching them together. Discover how Pandas, like a choreographer guiding dancers on stage, elegantly maneuvers through rows and columns, allowing you to explore data with precision and finesse.

Then, as the tempo quickens, you’ll transition to the lively beat of “Pivoting and Merging: Dancing with Pandas.” There, you explore the dynamic interplay of reshaping and combining datasets, analogous to dancers twirling and intertwining on the dance floor. Through pivoting and merging, you uncover hidden connections and illuminate new perspectives, revealing the underlying rhythms of your data.

So, grab your baton as you embark on this symphonic journey through the enchanting world of data harmonization. Let’s compose melodies of insight, harmonies of understanding, and rhythms of discovery as you unlock the true potential of your data.

Let’s get started.

Overview

This post is divided into two parts; they are:

• Segmenting and Concatenating: Choreographing with Pandas
• Pivoting and Merging: Dancing with Pandas

Segmenting and Concatenating: Choreographing with Pandas

One intriguing question you might pose is: How does the year a property was built influence its price? To investigate this, you can segment the dataset by ‘SalePrice’ into four quartiles—Low, Medium, High, and Premium—and analyze the construction years within these segments. This methodical division of the dataset not only paves the way for a focused analysis but also reveals trends that might be concealed within a collective review.

Segmentation Strategy: Quartiles of ‘SalePrice’

Let’s begin by creating a new column that neatly classifies the ‘SalePrice’ of properties into your defined price categories:

By executing the above code, you have enriched your dataset with a new column entitled ‘Price_Category’. Here’s a glimpse of the output you’ve obtained:

Visualizing Trends with the Empirical Cumulative Distribution Function (ECDF)

You can now split the original dataset into four DataFrames and proceed to visualize the cumulative distribution of construction years within each price category. This visual will help your understand at a glance the historical trends in property construction as they relate to pricing.

Below is the ECDF plot, which provides a visual summation of the data you’ve categorized. An ECDF, or Empirical Cumulative Distribution Function, is a statistical tool used to describe the distribution of data points in a dataset. It represents the proportion or percentage of data points that fall below or at a certain value. Essentially, it gives you a way to visualize the distribution of data points across different values, providing insights into the shape, spread, and central tendency of the data. ECDF plots are particularly useful because they allow for easy comparison between different datasets. Notice how the curves for each price category give you a narrative of housing trends over the years.
From the plot, it is evident that lower and medium-priced homes have a higher frequency of being built in earlier years, while high and premium-priced homes tend to be of more recent construction. Armed with the understanding that property age varies significantly across price segments, you find a compelling reason to use Pandas.concat().

Stacking Datasets with Pandas.concat()

As data scientists, you often need to stack datasets or their segments to glean deeper insights. The Pandas.concat() function is your Swiss Army knife for such tasks, enabling you to combine DataFrames with precision and flexibility. This powerful function is reminiscent of SQL’s UNION operation when it comes to combining rows from different datasets. Yet, Pandas.concat() stands out by offering greater flexibility—it allows both vertical and horizontal concatenation of DataFrames. This feature becomes indispensable when you work with datasets that have non-matching columns or when you need to align them by common columns, significantly broadening your analytical scope. Here’s how you can combine the segmented DataFrames to compare the broader market categories of ‘affordable’ and ‘luxury’ homes:

Through this, you can juxtapose and analyze the characteristics that differentiate more accessible homes from their expensive counterparts.

Kick-start your project with my book The Beginner’s Guide to Data Science. It provides self-study tutorials with working code.

Pivoting and Merging: Dancing with Pandas

Having segmented the dataset into ‘affordable’ and ‘luxury’ homes and explored the distribution of their construction years, you now turn your attention to another dimension that influences property value: amenities, with a focus on the number of fireplaces. Before you delve into merging datasets—a task for which Pandas.merge() stands as a robust tool comparable to SQL’s JOIN—you must first examine your data through a finer lens.

Pivot tables are an excellent tool for summarizing and analyzing specific data points within the segments. They provide you with the ability to aggregate data and reveal patterns that can inform your subsequent merge operations. By creating pivot tables, you can compile a clear and organized overview of the average living area and the count of homes, categorized by the number of fireplaces. This preliminary analysis will not only enrich your understanding of the two market segments but also set a solid foundation for the intricate merging techniques you want to show.

Creating Insightful Summaries with Pivot Tables

Let’s commence by constructing pivot tables for the ‘affordable’ and ‘luxury’ home categories. These tables will summarize the average gross living area (GrLivArea) and provide a count of homes for each category of fireplaces present. Such analysis is crucial as it illustrates a key aspect of home desirability and value—the presence and number of fireplaces—and how these features vary across different segments of the housing market.

With these pivot tables, you can now easily visualize and compare how features like fireplaces correlate with the living area and how frequently they occur within each segment. The first pivot table was crafted from the ‘affordable’ homes DataFrame and demonstrates that most properties within this grouping do not have any fireplaces.

The second pivot table which was derived from the ‘luxury’ homes DataFrame illustrates that properties within this subset have a range of zero to four fireplaces, with one fireplace being the most common.

With the creation of the pivot tables, you’ve distilled the data into a form that’s ripe for the next analytical step—melding these insights using Pandas.merge() to see how these features interplay across the broader market.

The pivot table above is the simplest one. The more advanced version allows you to specify not only the index but also the columns in the argument. The idea is similar: you pick two columns, one specified as index and the other as columns argument, which the values of these two columns are aggregated and become a matrix. The value in the matrix is then the result as specified by the aggfunc argument.

You can consider the following example, which produces a similar result as above:

This prints:

You can see the result is the same by comparing, for example, the count of low and medium homes of zero fireplaces to be 520 and 411, respectively, which 931 = 520+411 as you obtained previously. You see the second-level columns are labeled with Low, Medium, High, and Premium because you specified “Price_Category” as columns argument in pivot_table(). The dictionary to the aggfunc argument gives the top-level columns.

Towards Deeper Insights: Leveraging Pandas.merge() for Comparative Analysis

Having illuminated the relationship between fireplaces, home count, and living area within the segmented datasets, you are well-positioned to take your analysis one step further. With Pandas.merge(), you can overlay these insights, akin to how SQL’s JOIN operation combines records from two or more tables based on a related column. This technique will allow you to merge the segmented data on a common attribute, enabling a comparative analysis that transcends categorization.

Our first operation uses an outer join to combine the affordable and luxury home datasets, ensuring no data is lost from either category. This method is particularly illuminating as it reveals the full spectrum of homes, regardless of whether they share a common number of fireplaces.

In this case, the outer join functions similarly to a right join, capturing every distinct category of fireplaces present across both market segments. It is interesting to note that there are no properties within the affordable price range that have 3 or 4 fireplaces. You need to specify two strings for the suffixes argument because the “HmCount” and “AvLivArea” columns exist in both DataFrames pivot_affordable and pivot_luxury. You see “HmCount_aff” is zero for 3 and 4 fireplaces because you need them as a placeholder for the outer join to match the rows in pivot_luxury.

Next, you can use the inner join, focusing on the intersection where affordable and luxury homes share the same number of fireplaces. This approach highlights the core similarities between the two segments.

Interestingly, in this context, the inner join mirrors the functionality of a left join, showcasing categories present in both datasets. You do not see the rows corresponding to 3 and 4 fireplaces because it is the result of inner join, and there are no such rows in the DataFrame pivot_affordable.

Lastly, a cross join allows you to examine every possible combination of affordable and luxury home attributes, offering a comprehensive view of how different features interact across the entire dataset. The result is sometimes called the Cartesian product of rows from the two DataFrames.

The result is as follows, which demonstrates the result of cross-join but does not provide any special insight in the context of this dataset.

Deriving Insights from Merged Data

With these merge operations complete, you can delve into the insights they unearth. Each join type sheds light on different aspects of the housing market:

• The outer join reveals the broadest range of properties, emphasizing the diversity in amenities like fireplaces across all price points.
• The inner join refines your view, focusing on the direct comparisons where affordable and luxury homes overlap in their fireplace counts, providing a clearer picture of standard market offerings.
• The cross join offers an exhaustive combination of features, ideal for hypothetical analyses or understanding potential market expansions.

After conducting these merges, you observe amongst affordable homes that:

• Homes with no fireplaces have an average gross living area of approximately 1159 square feet and constitute the largest segment.
• As the number of fireplaces increases to one, the average living area expands to around 1296 square feet, underscoring a noticeable uptick in living space.
• Homes with two fireplaces, though fewer in number, boast an even larger average living area of approximately 1379 square feet, highlighting a trend where additional amenities correlate with more generous living spaces.

In contrast, you observe amongst luxury homes that:

• The luxury segment presents a starting point with homes without fireplaces averaging 1560 square feet, significantly larger than their affordable counterparts.
• The leap in the average living area is more pronounced as the number of fireplaces increases, with one-fireplace homes averaging about 1805 square feet.
• Homes with two fireplaces further amplify this trend, offering an average living area of nearly 1998 square feet. The rare presence of three and even four fireplaces in homes marks a significant increase in living space, peaking at an expansive 2646 square feet for a home with four fireplaces.

These observations offer a fascinating glimpse into how amenities such as fireplaces not only add to the desirability of homes but also appear to be a marker of larger living spaces, particularly as you move from affordable to luxury market segments.

Further Reading

Tutorials

Resources

Summary