Understanding RAG Part VI: Effective Retrieval Optimization

Be sure to check out the previous articles in this series:

In Retrieval augmented generation (RAG) systems, the performance of the retriever component responsible for identifying relevant context from an external knowledge base is as important as the language model’s performance in generating effective responses, if not more. It’s no surprise, therefore, that some efforts to improve RAG systems put a strong focus on optimizing the retrieval process.

This article describes some common approaches to improve RAG systems performance from the retrieval side of things. By implementing advanced retrieval techniques like hybrid search with reranking, selective retrieval, and query transformations, RAG systems better cope with frequent challenges like context irrelevance and information overload. Each strategy addresses different aspects of the retrieval process to ensure the generation of more accurate and relevant responses, and they all help narrow down retrieved data to pinpoint the most relevant and high-quality pieces of context, thereby boosting accuracy and efficiency, especially in long-context or specialized RAG applications.

Common Retrieval Optimization Strategies

Widely implemented methods for optimizing the retriever performance in RAG systems include the below three.

1. Hybrid Search and Reranking

Hybrid search combines two retrieval criteria to obtain a set of relevant documents (or document chunks). A common approach is to combine sparse and dense retrieval. Sparse retrieval uses keyword-based methods like TF-IDF to match exact terms, making it effective for precise term matching. In contrast, dense retrieval leverages embeddings (numerical representations of text) to capture semantic similarity, which is ideal when exact terms differ but meanings are similar. When the goal of this hybrid search mechanism is to optimize the ranking of retrieved documents by relevance, we apply reranking to prioritize documents to better adapt to the original user query’s intent.

2. Query Transformations

Query transformations consist of adjusting or expanding the query so that a broader or more specific set of retrieved documents are considered. This can be done for instance by incorporating synonyms of terms in the original query, or by rephrasing parts of it. Query transformations can help optimize the retriever’s effectiveness by increasing the odds of capturing high-quality context, especially in situations where exact terms may significantly vary.

3. Contextual Relevance Filtering

Once relevant documents are retrieved, this simple yet often effective approach applies filtering of them predicated on contextual metadata (like date and time, location, and authorship). This facilitates prioritizing the relevance of content to the user’s context and intent.

Advanced Retrieval Optimization Techniques

The following three techniques are more specialized methods, requiring additional setup but recommended for high-stakes RAG use cases.

1. Case-Specific Optimization

The idea behind case-specific optimization is to adapt or customize the retrieval process to a specific domain (e.g., medical, financial, etc.), fine-tuning the process to better capture the nuances of the target domain. One concrete solution to do this is through domain-specific weighting and ranking metrics, where certain terms or entities are prioritized based on their relevance within the target field. Another approach is to train or fine-tune the retriever on domain-specialized datasets.

2. Active Learning with Feedback Loops

Active learning with feedback loops is an interactive approach which incorporates user feedback to iteratively adjust and improve retrieval results, refining the model’s retrieval accuracy over time. Unlike other strategies for RAG retriever optimization, this one adapts the retrieval process by integrating real-time feedback, fostering alignment with user preferences or changing needs.

3. Semantic Hashing

Semantic hashing focuses on improving retrieval efficiency, by encoding documents as hash codes (typically compact binary vectors), which allow for faster similarity-based retrieval. It is a go-to solution in cases when RAG efficiency is paramount and can be combined with other of the above described strategies focused on relevance-based quality of retrieval results.

Wrapping Up

This article explored six strategies designed to enhance the performance of retrieval processes in RAG systems. Each technique varies in complexity and focuses on different aspects of optimization. Understanding these strategies is crucial for selecting the best approach — whether a single technique or a combination of them — that fits your specific RAG implementation.